Food Safe Gloves Explained
When selecting gloves for food processing, it's easy to assume that "food safe" is a single certification.
In reality, manufacturers supplying global food processors often need to demonstrate compliance with different regulatory requirements depending on where the gloves are used.
For North American operations, this typically means demonstrating compliance with applicable U.S. FDA food contact requirements and relevant Canadian food contact regulations.
Companies supplying globally may also demonstrate compliance with European food contact legislation through EN1186 migration testing.
FDA compliance
In the United States, reusable rubber articles intended for repeated food contact may fall under FDA 21 CFR 177.2600.
Rather than approving finished gloves, the regulation specifies extraction limits that rubber materials must meet before they can be safely used in repeated food contact applications.
Laboratory testing evaluates the extractable substances from rubber materials under the specified conditions to ensure extractable substances remain within the limits defined by the regulation. Products that meet these requirements are considered suitable for repeated food-contact applications within the scope of the regulation.
Canadian food contact requirements
Health Canada takes a science-based approach to food contact materials.
Manufacturers are responsible for ensuring materials used in food handling applications are suitable for their intended use and do not transfer substances that could make food unsafe or affect its suitability.
For companies supplying both Canadian and U.S. food manufacturers, gloves that meet recognised food contact requirements, including applicable FDA requirements where relevant, can form part of a wider compliance strategy.
What about EN1186?
Although EN1186 is a European test standard series, many global manufacturers test against it because international food processors often operate across multiple regions.
EN1186 provides the test methods for measuring migration from food contact materials into food simulants representing different food types.
Successful testing demonstrates that migration levels remains within the applicable limits required for food contact compliance.
For multinational food manufacturers, seeing both FDA compliance and EN1186 testing can provide additional confidence when selecting gloves for use across different markets.
What does the glass and fork symbol actually mean?

If you've ever looked closely at food handling gloves, utensils or food packaging, you've probably noticed a small symbol showing a wine glass and fork.
This is the internationally recognised symbol used to indicate that a material suitable for contact with food.
However, it's often misunderstood.
The symbol is not a quality mark or certification awarded by an independent body. Instead, it is a declaration by the manufacturer that the product complies with the relevant European food contact legislation.
When you see the glass and fork symbol on a glove, it tells you that the product has been designed and tested for food contact, not simply that it offers cut resistance or mechanical protection.
That distinction is important. A glove may provide excellent protection against cuts, but unless its materials have also been assessed for food contact, it shouldn't automatically be assumed to be suitable for handling food.
Food safety is only one requirement
A glove can be food contact compliant while still being unsuitable for a demanding food production task.
Processors should also evaluate:
-
Cut resistance
-
Grip in wet environments
-
Comfort
- Wash durability
-
Contamination risk
-
Product life
-
Dexterity
-
Thermal protection where required
Antimicrobial treatments are often applied as a finish or coating to the glove surface. The durability of these treatments can depend on the chemistry used, the application method and the laundering conditions the glove is exposed to.
Our antimicrobial technology takes a different approach, with the antimicrobial properties incorporated directly into the yarn during manufacture. This means the antimicrobial agent is embedded within the fibre structure rather than applied only to the surface of the glove. As a result, the antimicrobial properties are designed to remain present throughout the glove's intended service life, including the rigorous industrial laundering cycles required for reusable food processing gloves.
Selecting PPE should always balance worker safety with food safety.
Matching protection to the process
Different stages of food production require different glove solutions.
Primary processing often demands maximum cut protection.
Secondary processing benefits from lightweight gloves that improve dexterity.
Packing operations require grip, comfort and flexibility.
Distribution environments may call for coated gloves that provide durability while remaining suitable for incidental food contact.
Matching glove design to each operation helps improve both worker protection and production efficiency.
Food safety regulations are designed to protect consumers, but understanding how they work also helps safety professionals select the right PPE with greater confidence.
Whether you're specifying gloves for meat processing, poultry, seafood, prepared foods or packaging, understanding FDA food contact requirements, Canadian expectations and European EN1186 migration testing makes it easier to compare products and choose solutions that are truly fit for purpose.

Our latest Food Processing Hand Protection Guide glove recommendations for every stage of the food processing supply chain. From primary processing and deboning through to secondary processing, packing and distribution, making it easier to identify the most appropriate hand protection for each application.




